North Carolina Budget Talks Include Sports Betting Tax Adjustments and University Allocations

Jonas Schwarz · Jun 30, 2026

North Carolina Budget Talks Include Sports Betting Tax Adjustments and University Allocations

North Carolina state capitol building with budget documents and sports betting related materials on a desk

North Carolina lawmakers are negotiating a state budget proposal that would raise the tax rate on sports betting operators from 18% to 23% while extending a 6% tax to prediction market operators on net trading fees effective January 1 and these discussions take place in June 2026 as the state reviews revenue options after online sports betting launched in March 2024. The measures also allow sports bettors to deduct losses against winnings on state income taxes retroactive to January 1 2025 and they revise revenue distribution to include UNC and NC State universities with potential annual amounts reaching up to 5.8 million dollars starting July 2027 for certain schools.

Those who've tracked the legislation note that more than 300 million dollars in taxes have already been collected from online sports betting since operations began and this figure provides context for the current adjustments. The proposals address rising athletic department costs at public universities while operators have raised concerns about remaining competitive with illegal betting options that continue to operate outside regulated channels.

Details on Proposed Tax Rate Changes

Under the current framework operators pay 18% on gross gaming revenue from sports betting yet the budget negotiations seek to increase that rate to 23% which would apply across licensed platforms. Lawmakers have reviewed data from the first two years of legal operations and figures reveal steady collections that support state programs. Prediction market operators would face a new 6% tax on net trading fees beginning January 1 and this extension brings those platforms into the same regulatory structure as traditional sportsbooks.

Observers note that the effective date for prediction market taxes aligns with the start of the next calendar year while the sports betting rate change would take effect upon budget approval. Those involved in the talks have examined how similar increases in other states affected operator participation and market growth and data shows mixed outcomes depending on the overall tax burden relative to neighboring jurisdictions.

Bettor Loss Deductions and Retroactive Provisions

The proposal includes language allowing individual sports bettors to deduct their losses against winnings when filing state income taxes and this provision would apply retroactively to January 1 2025. Taxpayers who itemize deductions on their federal returns could receive corresponding state benefits under the new rules and this adjustment aims to align North Carolina policy more closely with federal treatment of gambling income. Revenue estimators have calculated the fiscal impact of the deduction and preliminary models suggest it would reduce overall collections by a modest percentage while providing relief to frequent bettors who report net losses in some years.

State tax officials have prepared guidance materials for the upcoming filing season and these documents outline how bettors should document their activity to claim the deduction. The retroactive element means some taxpayers may need to file amended returns for 2025 once the budget passes and this process follows standard procedures already in place for other tax adjustments.

University athletic facilities at UNC and NC State with revenue allocation charts overlay

Revenue Distribution Revisions for Universities

A key component of the negotiations involves redirecting portions of sports betting tax revenue to UNC and NC State athletic departments with annual distributions potentially reaching 5.8 million dollars beginning July 2027 for qualifying institutions. This allocation responds to documented increases in operating costs for college sports programs including facility maintenance travel expenses and compliance requirements. University officials have provided lawmakers with detailed cost breakdowns and these reports demonstrate the scale of funding gaps that have emerged in recent years.

The distribution formula would prioritize schools with Division I athletic programs and it would phase in over multiple budget cycles to allow for planning. Lawmakers have discussed safeguards to ensure the funds supplement rather than replace existing state support for higher education and this structure mirrors approaches used in other states that direct gaming revenue to public institutions.

Historical Tax Collections and Market Context

Since online sports betting launched in March 2024 North Carolina has collected more than 300 million dollars in taxes and this total reflects consistent month-over-month growth in handle and revenue. Regulators have published quarterly reports that break down collections by operator and by sport and these documents serve as the primary data source for current budget projections. The market has matured quickly with multiple licensed platforms competing for customers and this competition has kept promotional activity high while overall tax receipts have exceeded initial forecasts.

Illegal betting operations remain active and operator representatives have shared market share estimates suggesting a significant portion of total wagering still occurs outside the regulated system. The proposed tax increase and deduction provisions represent an attempt to narrow that gap by improving the relative attractiveness of legal platforms according to documents reviewed during negotiations.

Conclusion

The budget negotiations continue with multiple stakeholders providing input on the final package and lawmakers expect to reach agreement before the end of the current session. Once approved the changes would reshape the tax landscape for sports betting and prediction markets while directing new resources to university athletic programs. Implementation timelines vary by provision yet all measures tie back to the core goal of balancing revenue needs with market sustainability.